May 8, 2013

Is Mitt Romney The Father of Gay Marriage? Twenty-Four Reasons Why He Is

14)  ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­Romney supports the right of homosexuals to adopt children. The fact that he has spent his entire career advocating homosexual adoption rights – and still does today – one can only conclude that he would also support marriage rights. One logically leads to the other position. Here’s is what Romney said about gay adoption rights:

There will be children born to same-sex couples, and adopted by same-sax couples, and I believe that there should be rights and privileges associated with those unions and with the children that are part of those unions. (35)

Two years later, in 2007, Romney said this:

There are other ways to raise kids that’s fine—single moms, grandparents raising kids, gay couples raising kids.  That’s the American way, to have people have their freedom of choice. (36)

But Romney even went further than this.  In 2006, when Catholic Charities announced they would exclude homosexual couples from being able to adopt children, Romney’s  Department of Social Services informed them this was in violation of existing law.    However, there wasn’t any “anti-discrimination” law on the books which allows the state to trump religious freedom, and if there were, it would be violate both the U.S. Constitution and the state constitution.  The only obstacle were administrative regulations  enforced by Romney’s Office of Child Care Services and Department of Social Services bureaucrats, which could have been easily waived by Romney.  Even former liberal Governor Michael Dukakis told the media that the law didn’t apply to Catholic Charities, stating, “there’s nothing in there to the best of my knowledge that mandates  anything….”

Nonetheless, Romney, with great media fanfare (he knew he was running for president at this point), said he would introduce an unnecessary bill to give Catholic Charities an exemption from this mythical law (Yes, like the gay marriage law, another mythical law)  while continuing all along to assert, falsely, that gays have a right to adopt children.  However, legislative leaders had by this time informed Romney that it had no chance of passage, a little fact he left out of his news conferences.

In the meantime Catholic leaders were urging Romney to waive his own regulations but he refused to.   Ultimately, rather than compromise their religious principles, Catholic Charities had to drop their adoption services or lose their license altogether.  Romney’s refusal to fight for religious freedom set a horrible precedent in Massachusetts and his nonchalant attitude toward this assault on religious freedom is typified by this statement:

There are many, many other agencies that can meet the needs of those gay couples and I recognize that they [homosexuals] have a legitimate interested in being able to receive adoptive services.(37)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

About Rino Hunter